Globalism The 800-Pound Gorilla in the Living Room!

One-World Government

The number one issue, by far, in America’s presidential campaign is globalism. This one issue will determine the future course of the United States of America.

What is Globalism?

Globalism is simply the belief that the nation-state is now obsolete, and that the world must move into a system of global governance. Clearly stated, globalists believe national borders should be dissolved and a one-world government should be instituted.


Strobe Talbott stated it most clearly in his article, “The Birth of the Global Nation”, (Time, July 20, 1992) “…Within the next hundred years, nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority.”


Two years later, Talbott was tapped by President Bill Clinton to serve as Deputy Secretary of State, where he pushed his global agenda until the end of the Clinton presidency in 2001.

The Bible Prophesies a World Government

The two most famous prophecy books in the Bible, Daniel and Revelation, clearly prophesy a world government for the very near future.


Daniel 7:23 says it this way,


“Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.”


This passage refers to the last-day dictator—the Antichrist, who will rule the world just before the Second Coming of Jesus to the earth. Daniel 7:24-27 clearly states that this world government will continue up until the return of Jesus when the Kingdom of God will be established on earth.


Revelation 13:7 says of the Antichrist and his one-world government,


“And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.”


Revelation 13:5 even tells how long the world government will continue,


“And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.”


These forty-two months refer to the time of the Great Tribulation culminating with the Second Coming of Jesus to the earth.

Who is Promoting the Emerging World Government?

The drive toward one-world government did not just begin recently. It has been in progress for some time.


The following are actions or quotes by many prominent world leaders promoting globalism:


Woodrow Wilson: After World War I, President Woodrow Wilson conceived of a system of global governance called the League of Nations. However, members of the United States Congress understood that it would mean the surrender of U.S. sovereignty. Therefore, they refused to ratify the organization, consigning the League of Nations to the dustbin of history.


Franklin D. Roosevelt: In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered the term “Novus Ordo Seclorum” placed on the back of the U.S. dollar at the bottom of the pyramid. Novus is Latin for “New”, Ordo is Latin for “Order” and Seclorum is Latin for “Secular or World”. Way back in 1935, President Roosevelt was thinking about a New World Order. At the conclusion of World War II, Roosevelt became the driving force behind the formation of the United Nations. The UN was from the outset designed to ultimately be a structure for world government.


James Warburg: Son of Paul Warburg, Author of the Federal Reserve Act: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” (Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, l950)


Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952: “The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”


Senator William Fulbright: “The case for government by elites is irrefutable.” Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The symposium was entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?


Barry Goldwater: In his book, “With No Apologies,” former Republican presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power– political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.”


Note: The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller.


Richard Gardner: “The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”


(Council on Foreign Relations member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFRs journal, Foreign Affairs)


The Cold War—A Pause: After World War II, the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union immediately began. Consequently, not much progress was made toward global government for the next forty years.


Fall of the Berlin Wall—March Toward World Government Resumes: The fall of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989 signaled the end of the Cold War. Mikhail Gorbachev, George H.W. Bush and Pope John Paul II met together twenty days later. They came out of those meetings announcing the birth of the New World Order.


George H.W. Bush: Shortly after the meeting with Gorbachev and the pope, Bush, Sr. said, “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order…when we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN’s founders.”


Bill Clinton’s Speech at the UN–September 22, 1997: “The forces of global integration are a great tide, inexorably wearing away the established order of things…the United Nations must play a leading role in this effort, filling in the fault lines of the new global era.”


“Before the century ends, we should establish a permanent international court to prosecute the most serious violations of humanitarian law.”


This World Court is to place individuals on trial without the protection of the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights that was adopted by the World Community on July 17, 1998. It was then ratified and came into force in 2002.


Walter Cronkite—”The Most Trusted Man in America”: “It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace.


To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order…


Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. We need a system of enforceable world law– a democratic federal world government–to deal with world problems.”


(The above quote was taken from Cronkite’s speech while accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award, which is given annually by the World Federalist Association to the person doing the most to promote world government.)


David Rockefeller: Chairman of the Board–Chase Bank: “Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”


(Memoirs by David Rockefeller page 405 published in 2002)


David Rockefeller: “We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.”


(David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991)


England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair: “We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not.” He continued saying, “On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions.” He also said, “Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community.”


Henry Kissinger: When asked by a reporter at the beginning of President Obama’s first term in 2009 what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, “I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity; it isn’t just a crisis.”


Note: Kissinger was a life-long protégé of David Rockefeller.


Gideon Rachman, Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator for the Financial Times:  In his column Rachman said, “I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the U.S. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.


“A ‘world government’ would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.”


“So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might.”


Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.


Former Congressman John Rarick 1971: “The Council on Foreign Relations is ‘the establishment.’ Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.”


The above quotes promoting world government are simply a small sample of leaders that have come to believe the answer to global peace and security is one-world government. This idea has been promoted in colleges, the press, business circles and even throughout religious institutions until it has gained virtual control over both the Republican and the Democratic Parties. That’s the reason, no matter which party has been in power over the last 50 years, the country seems to just keep moving in the same direction—the direction of global governance.


Those who have been leading the United States steadily toward world government have become known as “the establishment”, whether Democrat or Republican.

What does “The Establishment” Believe?

The globalists believe the nation-state has outlived its usefulness. National sovereignty has become the problem, and a system of world government is the solution.


The reasoning goes like this. History shows that sovereign nations inevitably, sooner or later, come into conflict. When those conflicts can’t be worked out through diplomacy, nations then resort to war. Weapons of mass destruction have become so powerful that mankind now has the ability to destroy itself. Therefore, war must be eliminated—even outlawed.


The only way to do that is to eliminate nations, disband national armies, and place all arms under a global authority, thus making war impossible. When a dispute arises among states, they can take their issues before the United Nations presenting their cases before the UN Security Council. All nations would then agree to abide by the decisions of the global authority thus eliminating war forever. Since all national armies will have been disbanded and the only army left will be under the control of the global authority, all nations will have no choice but to submit to the decisions of the world government.

One Uncomfortable Question Remains

All these plans sound pretty good until we ask one uncomfortable question. What would happen if an Adolf Hitler should gain control over the only army that is left? The world’s checks and balances have been destroyed; consequently, the world would be subjected to the worst tyranny history has ever known!


Promoters of globalism argue that such a scenario will never happen. However, the Bible clearly prophesies that is exactly what is going to happen as soon as the planned world government becomes strong enough to dominate the world!


Only the world leader won’t be Adolf Hitler. It will be someone much worse. The Bible calls him the beast or the Antichrist!


The only thing standing between mankind and the emergence of the planned New World Order is the United States of America and the American people’s love of their national sovereignty. The states of Europe have already surrendered their sovereignty to the European Union. The leaders of the EU believe their European Union is only the first step to the coming global union. “The establishment” in America believe the same thing.

Presidential Election—November 8, 2016

Many Americans see problems with both of the presidential candidates that have emerged from the primaries. The issues being continually argued are many.


But the issue on which all other issues turn is globalism. Will America continue down the path to globalization and the New World Order, or will we reverse our course and reclaim our sovereignty? Will we trade our Declaration of Independence for a Declaration of Interdependence as the establishment say we must? Or will we defend our borders and the Judeo-Christian beliefs that have made us the land of the free and the home of the brave?


After the upcoming presidential debates, after the discussions of the political pundits and after all the arguments around the kitchen tables, this election will boil down to one issue: Globalism vs. National Sovereignty.

That is the 800-pound gorilla sitting in every living room in America!

1 reply

Comments are closed.