When the United Nations Security Council was created in 1945, it was intended to serve as the central pillar of global peacekeeping. Nearly eighty years on, however, it frequently finds itself deadlocked as geopolitical tensions among its members deepen.

In response to these challenges, the US administration is pursuing a more unconventional path: the creation of a “Board of Peace.” This proposed body would bring together a select group of states to coordinate conflict mediation and postwar reconstruction efforts outside the formal framework of the United Nations.

Proponents argue that such an arrangement could sidestep diplomatic stalemates and speed up peace initiatives. Critics, however, caution that it may erode the legitimacy of established international institutions and reshape the global order by granting recognition to human rights violators. As the debate continues, the Board of Peace poses a fundamental question: is it a competitor to the UN system, or a practical response to its increasing paralysis?