Summit of the Future Tyranny
The United Nations Rebrands its Global Takeover for 2024
The article discusses the United Nations’ increasing push for global control through initiatives like the “Summit of the Future” and the “Pact for the Future,” set for 2024. It highlights the U.N.’s agenda to strengthen global governance, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Agreement. Critics argue that these efforts represent a power grab that threatens national sovereignty and democracy. The article also raises concerns about the U.N.’s focus on environmental and economic control, labeling these initiatives as authoritarian, and drawing comparisons to a future global dictatorship, as prophesied in biblical terms.
By Rick Brinegar
“UN 2.0,” Total Control Power Grab
The United Nations global control agenda has been gaining traction and has already infiltrated many elements of our society. The World Court, World Bank, World Trade Organization and the World Health Organization, for example, are all components of the one-world government prophesied 2,000 years ago for the “time of the end” just ahead. (Daniel 12:4) To help achieve control of every aspect of our lives, the United Nations has scheduled the Summit of the Future to convene September 22 and 23, 2024, in New York. The Summit of the Future is part of the yearly United Nations General Assembly where member states will prepare to sign the Pact for the Future. The Pact for the Future is a United Nations power grab labeled “UN 2.0,” which revisits Strobe Talbott’s notable and soon-to-be-enacted “single global authority” with jurisdiction over all of humanity.[1] The U.N. will likely announce a planetary emergency and the need for stronger global government systems.[2] The United Nations has been committed to the scheduled implementation of the 2030 Agenda, a rebranding and repackaging of Agenda 21, which uses bureaucracies to make sweeping worldwide decisions outside of normal democratic processes. At the heart of the 2030 Agenda are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, an ambitious action plan which ostensibly sets out to achieve a “shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future.” It also sets forth guidelines to be implemented for reducing CO₂ emissions to curb climate change by shrinking economies and using less of the world’s resources.[3]
“Zero Draft,” a Global Solution
Perceptions of the United Nation’s pursuit of global power seem to have changed following the widespread fear induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. “After all,” say the globalists, “don’t we need a global solution for a global problem?” The global governance system is being pushed forward on many fronts. On one of these fronts is the advancement of the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Agreement which will be presented to the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, for final approval this September. Critics say it would give the WHO unprecedented power over member states and erode national sovereignty. The “Zero Draft” negotiating text is a first look at the massive Pandemic Agreement document. The Pandemic Agreement “Zero Draft” was published for review on Feb. 1, 2023.[4]
Our Common Agenda — Modern-day Fascism
For the most part, the “Zero Draft” of the Pandemic Agreement is a restatement of a previous document, “Our Common Agenda,” an initiative presented by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres in September 2021. The “Zero Draft” of January 2024 urges full, on-schedule compliance with the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda goals. It also pushes for “reinvigorating the multilateral system,” which would be “inclusive, to allow for a diverse range of actors beyond states.” According to journalist and filmmaker Derrick Broze, this is like the “multi-stakeholder capitalism” of the Great Reset promoted by the World Economic Forum. The Great Reset involves NGOs, think tanks, corporations and non-profits, sounding like a broadly supported international consensus, a “unity around our shared principles and common goals.” In realty, it has been, from the beginning, a modern-day form of fascism.[5]
Inclusive and Just or Restrictive and Sinister?
The United Nations is skilled in the use of lofty, warm and welcoming terms to describe their authoritarian and oppressive programs. According to the globalists, we need systems characterized as “for all,” “inclusive,” “just,” “representative,” “resilient,” “responsive,” and “a global order that works for everyone.” On the contrary, United Nations programs are more likely to be restrictive, divisive and sinister. According to the globalists, we should be so alarmed about imminent global emergencies that we accept tyrannical devices like the “carbon credit system” to protect us from widespread disasters such as the “climate crisis.” The “Zero Draft” of the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement says we need a “global financial system” that works for “all people,” as if we are all finally getting a seat at the table. In June 2023, French President Emmanuel Macron hosted the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact “to rethink the global financial architecture” and to mobilize financial support for developing and low-income countries. In other words, the globalists announced it was time to remake the financial systems of the entire planet.[6] As international bankers are restructuring the world’s financial systems, other global environmentalists want to punish anyone who harms human, plant or animal ecosystems.
“Environmental Crime” Prosecution
The “Zero Draft” of the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement calls for new international prosecution of people who harm the environment. Even if the new international body brings criminal action against major polluters, there is nothing to prevent them from going after individuals for what they consume, how much they drive or for using too many carbon credits.[7] The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 establishes that the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous waste at any place other than an authorized facility is illegal. The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 set up a $1.6-billion fund to be used for cleaning up abandoned hazardous waste sites. In addition, several states have decreed criminal sanctions for knowing or reckless conduct regarding the illegal disposal of toxic or hazardous waste.[8] Corporations which produce such ecological hazards are increasingly sensitive to public perception of their environmental responsibility.
Corporate Environmental Responsibility
An entirely new enterprise has appeared, consulting for CER or Corporate Environmental Responsibility. According to Digital Marketing Institute, customers believe companies should make socially and environmentally conscious investments.[9] A recent poll revealed that 80 percent of young adults are likely to base their purchases on a brand’s mission or purpose.[10] The more radical green economy globalists are calling for the International Criminal Court to prosecute corporations and organizations which harm the environment. Also, they are pushing to prosecute not just the organizations but also corporate CEOs, government officials and military officers. In other words, the United Nations will go after individuals who threaten the health of the ecosystem. The United Nations Environment Program website counsels that “innovative solutions” are necessary to “decouple” consumption and production patterns from the assault on ecosystems. The U.N. advocates “more sustainable, more responsible industrial practices.”[11] This is all part of a fearmongering power grab that has been going on for decades. Global elites claim there are too many people in the world for the environment to sustain. They also preach the ocean is boiling, the icecaps will melt, the coastlines will be underwater and most of the world will starve unless we do something about unsustainable industrial practices. Could it be that our sensitivity to “mother nature” is being usurped by authoritarian schemes?
“Emergency Fund” Power Grab
Out of feigned concern for “our common home,” the globalists also call for the United Nations to establish an “emergency platform” which would be activated if the planet receives a shock which produces “an impact on multiple regions of the world.” In such a case, the U.N. would require a “coherent, coordinated and multi-dimensional response.” António Guterres’ Our Common Agenda report explains a new Emergency Platform is necessary to respond to complex global crises such as “future pandemic risks, a major climatic event, or disruption to global flows of goods or people.”[12] Americans have struggled to reconcile their natural desire for independence with the need for cooperation with the global community, especially during major disasters. Peter J. Hoffman, Associate Professor at The New School, insists the U.N. Emergency Platform is not a power grab but rather a “timely reform.” He sees it as “a necessary and vital investment in a world where states remain indispensable to the political infrastructure of inclusive and impactful responses to mounting and complex global shocks.”[13] Underneath this facade of concern for planetary and public welfare, according to journalist Derrick Broze, the globalists are getting ready to declare a “planetary emergency,” and they want the U.N. to include an “emergency fund” to be used if the U.N. needs to extend its power reach over a multi-region disaster.[14]
UN War on Sovereignty
As policymakers address crimes against nature, the sovereignty and decision-making powers of nations are slipping away. While the proficiency of technical experts might be valuable, decisions made by technocrats do not always align with the democratic values and individual freedoms cherished by society. The United Nations wants to move toward a “reinvigorated multilateral system,” but at what cost to national sovereignty? Pandemics used to be rare, but the World Health Organization warns that we are now dealing with never-ending pandemics which will become the “new normal.” As the United Nations pushes for unlimited power for the World Health Organization, it is obvious that the WHO is planning for a one-world government.[15]
New World Order Forming Now
Allan Gerson, counsel to Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick during her service at the United Nations, at the occasion of the publication of her book, “Making War to Keep Peace,” quoted Kirkpatrick as writing, “We cannot protect ourselves and others from the resurgence of aggressive powers or the reoccurrence of evil unless we face the fact that tyranny [at home] and war [abroad] have the same source–in persons who use force to expand their control of others.” Gerson also said one of the George H. W. Bush administration’s key motivations for Operation Desert Storm was related to Bush’s vision of a new world order based on a “reinvigorated United Nations.”[16]
Satan’s Counterfeit King
Current events are moving the elements into position for a global government to be revealed in the extremely near future. Daniel 8 describes the Antichrist as a world dictator who will reign as Satan’s counterfeit king. He will be the political leader who unites all nations under the New World Order. God’s purpose for humanity has always been to establish a unified kingdom but under His authority not our own or Satan’s. The Antichrist will consolidate his power with the assistance of a religious leader, the False Prophet, with the goal of total control. Just such a global tyrant is waiting in the wings of the worldwide stage for his opportunity to appropriate existing United Nations’ centralized institutions for his own evil schemes.
“And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” (Revelation 13:7-8)
[1] Talbott, S. (1992, July 20). America Abroad: The Birth of the Global Nation. Time. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,976015,00.html
[2] [Conscious Resistance Network]. (2024, April 30). We Must Fight the Summit of The Future & The Planetary Emergency [Video]. Conscious Resistance Network. https://www.bitchute.com/video/wp8z2aZaXOS8/
[3] Evans, O. (2024, January 16). Humanitarian Emergency Adviser Says UK Foreign Aid Should Lead with Trade Instead of ‘Degrowth’. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/humanitarian-emergency-adviser-says-uk-foreign-aid-should-lead-with-trade-instead-of-degrowth-5560609
[4] Privacy International (2023, March 20). PI’s comments on the zero draft of the WHO’s Pandemic. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://privacyinternational.org/advocacy/5035/pis-comments-zero-draft-whos-pandemic-treaty
[5] [Digileaks]. (2024, May 3). United Nations 2.0 EXPOSED!!! – The Summit of the Future Takeover [Video]. DIGILEAK NEWS Not Noise. https://www.bitchute.com/video/axMNc2ROQo8E/ https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=united%20nations%202.0%20exposed!!!%20-%20the%20summit%20of%20the%20future%20takeover&kind=video&sort=new
[6] Tran, H. (2023, June 27). Lessons from the Paris Summit for a New Global Financing Pact. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/lessons-from-the-paris-summit-for-a-new-global-financing-pact/
[7] [Digileaks]. (2024, May 3). United Nations 2.0 EXPOSED!!! – The Summit of the Future Takeover [Video]. DIGILEAK NEWS Not Noise. https://www.bitchute.com/video/axMNc2ROQo8E/ https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=united%20nations%202.0%20exposed!!!%20-%20the%20summit%20of%20the%20future%20takeover&kind=video&sort=new
[8] Matulewich, V. A. Environmental Crimes Prosecution: A Law Enforcement Partnership. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 60(4), 20-25. https://doi.org/129289
[9] Digital Marketing Institute (2024, January 2). 16 Brands Doing Corporate Social Responsibility Successfully. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://digitalmarketinginstitute.com/blog/corporate-16-brands-doing-corporate-social-responsibility-successfully
[10] SWNS Rocks (2023, August 22). Most Gen Z and Millennials base purchases on a brand’s mission: Poll. New York Post.
[11] The United Nations Environment Assembly (n.d.). Responsible Industry. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/responsible-industry
[12] Guterres, A. (2023, March 9). Secretary-General Launches ‘Our Common Agenda’ Policy Briefs on Delivering 2030 Agenda Promises, Strengthening Response to Global Shocks. United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://press.un.org/en/2023/sgsm21718.doc.htm
[13] Hoffman, P. J. (n.d.). The UN Emergency Platform Idea is Not a “Power Grab”—It’s a Force Multiplier. Stinson. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://www.stimson.org/2023/the-un-emergency-platform-idea-is-not-a-power-grab-its-a-force-multiplier/
[14] [Digileaks]. (2024, May 3). United Nations 2.0 EXPOSED!!! – The Summit of the Future Takeover [Video]. DIGILEAK NEWS Not Noise. https://www.bitchute.com/video/axMNc2ROQo8E/ https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=united%20nations%202.0%20exposed!!!%20-%20the%20summit%20of%20the%20future%20takeover&kind=video&sort=new
[15] [Stew Peters Network]. (2023, September 23). United Nations Declares WAR On Sovereignty: W.H.O Plans One World Government [Video]. Stew Peters Network. https://rumble.com/v3itrum-united-nations-declares-war-on-sovereignty-w.h.o-plans-one-world-government.html
[16] Gerson, A. (2007, April 25). On Publication of Jeane J. Kirkpatrick’s Making War to Keep Peace. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from https://www.aei.org/research-products/speech/on-publication-of-jeane-j-kirkpatricks-making-war-to-keep-peace/