Global Warming/Climate Change Scaring us into Accepting a World Government

April 25, 2013   |   Category: Endtime Magazine Articles   |   Tags: , , ,

And yes, my plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet – because climate change is not a hoax. More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke. They’re a threat to our children’s future. And in this election, you can do something about it.

President Barack Obama

Democratic National Convention

September 6, 2012 

Global Warming/Climate Change Scaring us into Accepting a World Government

By Dave Robbins 

 

Everyone on earth would agree with Mr. Obama that climate change is not a hoax. Actually, the climate has changed every day since God created the earth. Today may be a sunny 70-degree day, while tomorrow might bring rain and drop into the fifties. Bingo, the climate just changed!

 

However, it is Mr. Obama’s definition of climate change that is simply not true. He boldly proclaims that carbon pollution or Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is heating our planet, which is resulting in an increase in droughts, floods and wildfires that threaten the future of our children. Seeing the overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that has been given over the years that totally disproves the theory of man-made global warming, one has to wonder why the president or anyone else would even bring it up.

 

It seems that for decades global elitists have been spinning tales of an impending ice age or catastrophic global warming in an effort to keep the masses in a perpetual state of fear. But, now that global cooling and global warming have been so easily disproven, politicians and their on-staff scientists have resorted to promoting fear of man-made “climate change”. Now they can blame every hurricane, earthquake, drought, flood or snowstorm on human beings.

 

Wake up everyone! God has been regulating the temperature of this planet for thousands of years. The very idea that a government entity can control the weather or the temperature of the planet by regulating the amount of CO2 that we emit into the atmosphere is preposterous!

 

But that is precisely the message that Mr. Obama and his cohorts at the United Nations continue to spread. According to Bloomberg, the United States, European Union and Japan, along with other developed nations, have already given the United Nations $23 to $34 billion to fight “man-made” climate change!

 

The problem with world leaders spreading the message that man-made global warming is heating up the planet, which in turn causes all sorts of climate change catastrophes, is that none of it is true. That’s right America… it’s all a lie! Science has already debunked the man-made global warming scam, and yet, Mr. Obama emphatically claims that it’s true.

 

So what are the realities? Is global warming man-made, and if not, why are politicians, world leaders, scientists and global dreamers continuing to lie about it?

 

Is Global Warming Man-Made?

The entire global warming/climate change theory hinges on the premise that humans through the emission of greenhouse gases (mainly CO2) are causing the temperature of the earth to rise. As a result, the climate changes, which leads to all sorts of weather catastrophes such as snowstorms, drought, tornadoes, hurricanes and tsunamis, etc. The global warming alarmists contend that the more CO2 humans emit into the atmosphere, the more the planet heats up. They frantically warn that, if this is not stopped, we will destroy the planet.

 

So, is any of this really happening? The answer is no. None of this is true! As a matter of fact, most scientists do not agree with this man-made global warming theory and have offered sound scientific data debunking the myth. Here are just a few of the many proofs that have been provided:

 

Proof #1:

Temperature increases CO2 not vice versa…

 

In his now famous global warming documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” former Vice President Al Gore produced a graph depicting the variations of temperature and levels of CO2 in the atmosphere over the last 650,000 years according to computer generated models.

 

In the graph, Mr. Gore strategically separated the two lines and placed the temperature line below that of the CO2 line. This was done in an attempt to create the delusion that, when the amount of CO2 emissions increased, the temperature automatically began to climb as well.

 

Mr. Gore’s obvious conclusion was that global warming was being generated by mankind’s modern industrial development, which has increased the amount of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere. As a solution, Mr. Gore advocated global laws that would revolutionize our lifestyle, redistribute the wealth of the world through his proposed cap and trade legislation, and establish a system of global governance that would end national sovereignty.

 

However, after experts analyzed the graph by placing the CO2 line directly over the temperature line, they proved conclusively that CO2 levels had risen only as a result of an increase in temperature, not the other way around. A closer look at the graph revealed that the lag time between temperature and CO2 levels changing was at times as much as eight hundred years apart.

 

This one proof alone has destroyed the entire basis for the global warming theory. An increased amount of CO2 does not result in global warming.

 

Actually, the opposite is true! But let’s continue…

 

Proof #2:

CO2 has risen at a record rate for over a decade, but global temperatures have remained the same…

 

According to an article by James Taylor in Forbes magazine, the U.S. Department of Energy revealed in its “estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions for the year 2010” that, since 2001, carbon emissions had increased 33 percent globally, yet the earth’s temperatures had remained the same for over a decade. He went on to state, “The fact that global temperatures are not rising despite such a significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions provides validation of skeptical arguments, not a cause for heightened alarm.”

 

CO2 emissions do not cause temperatures to rise.

 

Proof #3:

Dr. Michael Mann’s infamous hockey stick graph…

 

Dr. Michael Mann’s graph, showing multi-proxy temperatures of the Northern Hemisphere for the past 1,000 years, appeared in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. By gathering data from ice cores and tree rings samples, Mr. Mann’s graph supposedly proved that the earth’s air temperatures were fairly stable for 900 years and then began an unprecedented climb in the twentieth century, which made the lines on the graph look like a “hockey stick.” This increase in temperature was then attributed to man-made greenhouse gas emissions from the industrialization of the world. The chart was widely accepted in the global warming circles and even made an appearance in Mr. Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” global warming movie.

 

However, there were some major scientific errors with the chart. (1) The ice core and tree ring samples were taken from the northern hemisphere, which hardly provided a true global temperature reading for the last 1,000 years. (2) The graph totally dismisses the Medieval Warming Period (800 AD -1300 AD) and the Little Ice Age (1300 AD – 1900 AD), which are two climate events that are widely accepted in the scientific community.

 

The graph was further debunked when Keith Briffa of the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) presented tree ring data calculations that revealed a decline in temperature beginning in 1961. This new data prompted the “Climategate” email from CRU director Philip Jones to Michael Mann and others which stated, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1980 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline (in global temperatures).”

 

This “hide the decline” remark was an obvious cover-up for Keith Briffa’s actual data that showed the decline in global temperatures and placed yet another nail in the global warming coffin.

 

In the aftermath of the Climategate scandal and in a last ditch effort to keep the global warming hoax alive, global warming alarmist attempted to explain away the Medieval Warming Period (MWP) by stating that perhaps there were isolated areas of warming. However, there were too many easy-to-understand proofs.

 

For example, during the MWP the Vikings sailed in waters now frozen. The Vikings took advantage of the ice-free seas to colonize Greenland and other outlying lands of the far north. Around 1000 AD the climate was sufficiently warm for the north of Newfoundland to support a Viking colony that came to be called “Vinland” because of the fine grapes and wines produced there. These areas are under ice today. This provides absolute proof that it was warmer back then than it is now, and there were no factories or SUVs.

 

Conclusion? Global warming was not man-made then, and it’s not man-made now!

 

What Do Scientist Say?

On June 22, 2012, USA TODAY published an article titled, “Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real”. In the article, author Doyle Rice states, “Nearly all the experts agreed that it is very likely that anthropogenic (man-made) greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth’s average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century… As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found that their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues…” Is this true?

 

Let’s see what a few of those “below average” scientists have to say about man-made global warming and climate change…

 

I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism….I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect….Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science. The earth’s climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.

 

Will Harper, Princeton University physicist, former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy 

 

What I’d do with the IPCC report is to put it in the trash can because that’s all it’s worth….carbon dioxide was an insignificant component of the earth’s atmosphere and that, rather than being the purveyor of doom it is currently viewed as today, it is needed in order for plants to grow….’Mars’ atmosphere is about 95 percent CO2 and has no global warming.

 

Dennis Hollars, Astrophysicist 

 

The lesson to the world here is, when it comes to science; never blindly accept an explanation from a politician or scientists who have turned political for their own private gain. Taxing carbon will have absolutely no beneficial effect on our climate, will hurt the economies of the world, and will be harmful to the production of food because less carbon dioxide means reduced plant growth.

 

Bob Ashworth, chemical engineer, 16 U.S. patents, has written 55 technical papers, American Geophysical Union, authored a 2008 technical analysis of global warming 

 

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

 

Fred W. Decker, professor of Meteorology-Oregon State University

 

The new green left (environmentalist) propaganda reminds me of the old red left (communist) propaganda. The dirty word is now carbon rather than capitalism. The game is simply to intrude and control everything.

 

Vincent U. Muirhead, professor emeritus of aerospace engineering, researched gas dynamics, University of Kansas

 

I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process [IPCC process] that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.

 

Chris Landsea, former IPCC scientist

 

As a geologist, I love Earth observations, but it is ridiculous to tie this objective to a ‘consensus’ that humans are causing global warming when human experience, geologic data and history, and current cooling can argue otherwise. ‘Consensus,’ as many have said, merely represents the absence of definitive science. You know as well as I, the ‘global warming scare’ is being used as a political tool to increase government control over American lives, incomes and decision making.

 

Jack Schmitt, geology scientist and U.S. astronaut 

 

 Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.

 

Kiminori Itoh, member of IPCC process, award-winning environmental physical chemist

 

…Consensus in science is an oxymoron. From Galileo to Einstein, one scientist with proof is more convincing than thousands of other scientists who believe something to be true. And I don’t even grant that there is a consensus among scientists; it’s just that the press only promotes the global warming alarmists and ignores or minimizes those of us who are skeptical. To many of us, there is no convincing evidence that carbon dioxide produced by humans has any influence on the Earth’s climate.

 

Mark L. Campbell, professor of chemistry at the U.S. Naval Academy

 

Our understanding on the complexities of our climate system, the Earth itself and even the sun are still quite limited. Scaring people into submission is not the answer to get people to change their environmental ways…if Earth was suffering under an accelerated greenhouse effect caused by human produced addition of CO2, the troposphere should heat up faster than the surface of the planet, but data collected from satellites and weather balloons do not support this fundamental presumption even though we are seeing higher CO2. We ought to see near lockstep temperature increments along with higher CO2 concentration over time, especially over the last several years. But we’re not.

 

Mike MiConnell, hydrologist/geologist, professional Earth scientist U.S. Forest Service 

 

I believed [global warming theory]. It made sense….” He then conducted extensive climate research and wrote a detailed analysis announcing that he had reversed his views…. “Did the math and realized that you just can’t get to global warming with CO2.

 

William F. McClenney, professional geologist and former Certified Environmental Auditor, former global warming proponent

 

Not only is it false that human activity has any significant effect on global warming or the weather in general, but for the record, global warming is over. The fear-mongering hysteria about human-caused global warming is completely unjustified and is totally counterproductive to our Nation’s essential needs and security.

 

Martin Hertzberg, retired U.S. Navy meteorologist

 

It is now becoming quite obvious that there is a purposeful distortion of truth concerning the global warming and climate change theory. The question is, “Why?” Why would politicians, world leaders, scientists and global dreamers attempt to perpetrate an unproven belief system upon the human race that would result in bringing total revolution to the world?

 

Driving Humanity into World Government

 

After WWII, the United Nations (UN) was founded as an international organization to maintain peace and security by developing friendly relationships between nations and promoting social progress. The idea behind this institution sounded great until it was discovered that the charter establishing the UN was drafted by a convicted communist spy, Alger Hiss.

 

With a communistic agenda driving the mechanics of the organization, it is easy to see how the global elites have been able to work from within the UN to quietly build a world government. A socialist world government is the goal and promoting belief in global warming is the number one vehicle to reach that goal.

 

One of the core belief systems of socialism is that most conflict in society stems from an ever-broadening gap between the wealthy and the poor. The contention is that the wealthy are the ruling class and will inevitably use their economic power to enforce their will upon the less fortunate. The ultimate socialist solution to this “problem” is to abolish private property ownership, for the state to own all principal means of production with the central government re-distributing wealth evenly among the masses. The result would be a classless communistic society where a global government would ensure equality for all citizens.

 

It would be impossible to fully realize the dream of a communistic one-world government without the redistribution of wealth from the developed nations to the poor underdeveloped nations of the world. This is the main goal of the global warming and climate change hoax. The United Nations elites know that a perpetual global life-threatening crisis is necessary to convince wealthy nations to accept the punitive cost of cap and trade taxes.

 

Wealth redistribution is exactly what carbon cap and trade laws are designed to accomplish. The government will set a cap on the amount of carbon emissions that an industrialized nation can emit. If the limit is exceeded, carbon credits can be purchased from underdeveloped nations who have more credits than they need.

 

Remember. We have proven conclusively that CO2 emissions have nothing to do with global warming. Global warming fear mongering is simply a scheme put together by global elites to redistribute the wealth of the world and to move us into world government.

 

Global warming is only one of the messages being used to force the nations of the world into world government. Anytime you hear global governance propaganda like Agenda 21, sustainable development, nationalized healthcare, social justice and national identification programs…think world government. But it is global warming (oops, climate change) that is presently the poster child being used to frighten everyone into giving up freedom for saving the planet.

 

Former governor of the state of Washington, Dixie Lee Ray probably summed it up best when she said, “The objective, clearly enunciated by the leaders of UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development), is to bring about a change in the present system of independent nations. The future is to be World Government with central planning by the United Nations. Fear of environmental crises – whether real or not – is expected to lead to – compliance”.

 

Compliance to a communistic world governing body is the goal and the global warming/climate change deception is the “life threatening crisis” that the United Nations has chosen to get there. Remember the words of Mr. Obama, “…because climate change is not a hoax.” Yeah right!

 

Thankfully, for those who are paying attention, none of this is surprising since the Bible prophesies the establishment of a world government just before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. And observing the rapid rate at which prophecies are being fulfilled, that event can’t be very far off!

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

One Response to “Global Warming/Climate Change Scaring us into Accepting a World Government”

  1. Although they are corrected, in the fact that climate change is not “completely” man-made, it is a pretty good amount our fault. The pollution we put into our air speeds up the process around 5 billion years too early. “A specific number” you may think. Well, the Earths life span realize on the Suns life span, which is 5 billion years. With that much time left our planet we should be no where near the global warming stages. Yet here we are. The cause? Us.